Ani Martirosian

IH8A9414

Ani Martirosian is Of Counsel at ADLI Law Group.

Ms. Martirosian specializes in intellectual property, patent, trademark, copyright prosecution and protection of trade secrets.

Prior to joining ADLI Law Group, Ms. Martirosian was an attorney at Phil IP Law Group, where she advised her clients in all aspects of intellectual property law including copyright, trademark, and patent related legal services and client counseling. Ms. Martirosian has also represented employees in all aspects of employment litigation, including wage and hour class action and unfair business practices. Ms. Martirosian is passionate about the work she does and the interests of her clients come before all other considerations.

Ms. Martirosian attained her Bachelor of Science degree in Cellular Molecular Biology and Biotechnology from California State University, Northridge and graduated with honors. She worked in the Biotechnology field prior to attending law school.

Ms. Martirosian earned her Juris Doctor from Santa Clara Law School, where she received the Cali Excellence for Future Award and was a participant of honors moot court. Ms. Martirosian also participated in the Academic Success Program, where she mentored fellow law students and was the treasurer of the South Asian Law Student Association.

Ms. Martirosian is a member in good standing with the California State Bar and in the United States District Court for the Central District. She is fluent in English, Armenian and Russian.


Areas of Practice:
  • Intellectual Property Counseling & Advice
  • Patent Prosecution & Counseling
  • Trademark Prosecution & Counseling
  • Copyright Prosecution & Counseling
  • Litigation & Transactional Departments Support
Education:
  • Santa Clara Law School, Juris Doctor, 2017
  • Cal. State University Northridge, Bachelor of Science, Cellular Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, 2010
Languages:
  • English
  • Armenian
  • Russian

Anti-SLAPP: When State and Federal Rules Collide

June 12, 2018

The degree to which California’s anti-SLAPP provisions conflict with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is an issue that has been hotly disputed since California Code of Civil Procedure §…

When Court Powers Supersede the Will of the Parties

June 12, 2018

On May 18, 2018, the Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court’s grant of summary judgment on an issue raised sua sponte by the court, despite the fact that the parties…

Subsidized Free Speech

June 12, 2018

A group of California grape growers/shippers brought an action in the County of Fresno against the California Table Grape Commission, contending that the Commission’s collection of assessments under the Ketchum…