Ani Martirosian


Ani Martirosian is Of Counsel at ADLI Law Group.

Ms. Martirosian specializes in intellectual property, patent, trademark, copyright prosecution and protection of trade secrets.

Prior to joining ADLI Law Group, Ms. Martirosian was an attorney at Phil IP Law Group, where she advised her clients in all aspects of intellectual property law including copyright, trademark, and patent related legal services and client counseling. Ms. Martirosian has also represented employees in all aspects of employment litigation, including wage and hour class action and unfair business practices. Ms. Martirosian is passionate about the work she does and the interests of her clients come before all other considerations.

Ms. Martirosian attained her Bachelor of Science degree in Cellular Molecular Biology and Biotechnology from California State University, Northridge and graduated with honors. She worked in the Biotechnology field prior to attending law school.

Ms. Martirosian earned her Juris Doctor from Santa Clara Law School, where she received the Cali Excellence for Future Award and was a participant of honors moot court. Ms. Martirosian also participated in the Academic Success Program, where she mentored fellow law students and was the treasurer of the South Asian Law Student Association.

Ms. Martirosian is a member in good standing with the California State Bar and in the United States District Court for the Central District. She is fluent in English, Armenian and Russian.

Areas of Practice:
  • Intellectual Property Counseling & Advice
  • Patent Prosecution & Counseling
  • Trademark Prosecution & Counseling
  • Copyright Prosecution & Counseling
  • Litigation & Transactional Departments Support
  • Santa Clara Law School, Juris Doctor, 2017
  • Cal. State University Northridge, Bachelor of Science, Cellular Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, 2010
  • English
  • Armenian
  • Russian

Designing Damages

July 3, 2024

In Samsung v. Apple, both determining “apportionment” and properly identifying an “article of manufacture” were key in the Court’s interpretation of the Code For over a century, design patents have enjoyed…

When Is A Design Patent Invalid For Being Obvious?

When Is A Design Patent Invalid For Being Obvious?

May 9, 2024

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeal has granted a request for an en banc hearing to determine the proper standard for invalidity of design patents based on obviousness under 35…

Deceptive Intent for Patent Unenforceability Based on a Pattern of Conduct

May 2, 2024

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeal has just issued a significant ruling in Luv n’ Care, Ltd. v. Laurain (Fed. Cir., Apr. 12, 2024, No. 2022-1905) 2024 WL 1590593, at *8–9 (LUV)…