Jamie Wright

jamie-wright-portrait

Jamie E. Wright is a dynamic employment litigation attorney renowned for her strategic, results-driven advocacy in complex workplace disputes. With a sharp focus on labor and employment law, Jamie brings a thoughtful and modern approach to litigating matters such as wage and hour claims, discrimination, and contract disputes.

Professional Background
Jamie combines legal insight with strategic communication, positioning her at the intersection of law, business, and politics. She previously served as a senior labor and employment attorney and is a partner at Millennial Government Affairs (MGA), where she designs crisis communication plans and legally compliant strategies for political campaigns and corporate clients.

Why Clients Value Her
Clients appreciate Jamie’s forward-thinking perspective and strategic execution. Whether navigating litigation or managing crises, she delivers a blend of legal rigor and innovative problem-solving.


Areas of Practice:
  • Employment Litigation
  • Wage & Hour Claims
  • Wrongful Termination
  • Discrimination & Harassment Cases
  • Crisis Communication & Compliance Strategy
Education:
  • University of California, Hastings College of the Law, Juris Doctor
  • University of California, Berkeley, Bachelor of Arts
Languages:
  • English

Federal Circuit Ruling Significantly Clarifies Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Standard

June 16, 2026

A recent ruling of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeal, which has plenary jurisdiction over all patent appeals, has  clarified the application of the standard for patent subject matter eligibility,…

Practice Tips: En Banc Ruling Sets Higher Threshold for Expert Testimony 

April 27, 2026

An en banc decision by the Federal Circuit has reinforced the conclusion among some patent practitioners that the court implemented a higher standard of scrutiny for expert opinions, raising concerns…

Adjusting the Standard for Patent Subject Matter Eligibility

February 16, 2026

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeal issued a decision last year Contour IP Holding LLC v. GoPro, Inc., 113 F.4th 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2024) (“GoPro”), which addressed subject matter eligibility…