K. Brian Matlock

KBM jpg

Brian Matlock is a seasoned senior corporate counsel and former law firm partner with extensive experience in corporate law, securities regulation, mergers & acquisitions, technology transactions, intellectual property, and complex litigation. He has successfully saved clients millions in litigation costs and provided strategic advice to private equity firms, venture capitalists, tech companies, and closely held businesses. His expertise has led to favorable outcomes in negotiations, settlements, arbitrations, and litigation, securing millions in client savings and verdicts.

Recently, Brian served as general counsel for Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, managing FDA New Drug Applications, major litigation, and corporate compliance. He also worked as senior counsel with Intel Corporation on a $10B spin-out transaction, driving significant cost savings and generating substantial licensing revenue.

In addition to his legal expertise, Brian has a strong background in technology commercialization and licensing within university settings and has played a pivotal role in securing up to $60MM in equity funding for startups. His earlier career includes engineering, business development, and R&D management roles with global manufacturers, where he was recognized as a top performer.

Brian has led legal teams in high-stakes matters, including saving a client over $1MM in lost profits and securing $600K in new revenue in a trade secrets mediation. He has advised C-level executives and Fortune 500 managers on dispute resolution, licensing, R&D, acquisitions, international business, and capital finance. His work also includes closing numerous exclusive licensing and research agreements at the University of Missouri-Columbia and leading legal efforts as general counsel at Shift Pharmaceuticals and ImpeDx Diagnostics in Kansas City.


Areas of Practice:
  • Intellectual Property Law
  • Corporate Law
  • Copyright Law
  • Patent Law
  • Trademark Law
  • Business Law
  • Startup Law
Education:
  • Washington University in St. Louis
  • University of the Pacific - McGeorge School of Law
Languages:
  • English
  • German
When Is A Design Patent Invalid For Being Obvious?

When Is A Design Patent Invalid For Being Obvious?

May 9, 2024

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeal has granted a request for an en banc hearing to determine the proper standard for invalidity of design patents based on obviousness under 35…

Deceptive Intent for Patent Unenforceability Based on a Pattern of Conduct

May 2, 2024

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeal has just issued a significant ruling in Luv n’ Care, Ltd. v. Laurain (Fed. Cir., Apr. 12, 2024, No. 2022-1905) 2024 WL 1590593, at *8–9 (LUV)…

When it comes to damages recovery, design patents trump utility patents

January 26, 2024

Determination of reasonable royalty is often difficult to prove and can leave a large portion of the profits with the infringer. Lost profits, on the other hand, corresponds to the…